Yesterday
the Senate passed a bill to sharply delay the increases in flood insurance
rates for millions of property owners in coastal and flood-prone areas. The
bill effectively guts a 2012 law (“Responsible Implementation of Flood
Insurance Reform Act”) that had aimed to overhaul the nearly bankrupt National
Flood Insurance Program. The Program which subsidizes insurance for buildings
in flood zones, had a $24 billion deficit following claims from Hurricane
Sandy. The law’s aim was to raise revenues for the federal flood insurance
program. The law had also required updating of federal flood zones, which could
determine which property owners will be required to purchase flood insurance by
their mortgage holders.
Although the bill delaying the rate increases had bi-partisan
support it still drew criticism from a broad spectrum of outside groups. “It will return the program to a state of
insolvency,” and “General
taxpayers will be footing the rest of the cost.” according to an article written
in the New York Times that quoted Shai Akabas an analyst at the Bipartisan
Policy Center, a Washington research group. The aim of the 2012 law was to
shift the financial risk of insuring flood-prone properties to the private
market from taxpayers. The debate over who will pay for the nation’s rapidly
rising costs for flood damage remains unclear.
Over
the past year, millions of coastal property owners were hit with flood
insurance rate increases that sent their premiums soaring up to five or 10
times the previous amounts. As their insurance bills soared and their property
values plummeted, homeowners begged lawmakers to block or delay the 2012
law.
Most
Tybee properties are located in the highest risk flood areas, known as V zone.
With few exceptions, Tybee non-primary residences with a first floor not built
off the ground would have seen a significant increase. Many other parts of
Chatham County are also located in high flood risk zones, and many homes built
before the creation of the National Flood Insurance Program have long been
eligible for subsidized policies.
Savannah
morning news reported: Russ Pennington, director of policy and public affairs
with the Georgia Environmental Protection Division, said Tuesday the impact
hasn’t been drastic so far.
“What
we’ve seen in other parts of the state that have preceded Effingham area
specifically, it seems to be a wash,” he said. “Some areas are found to no
longer be in the flood zone; some new areas are found to be in the flood zone.
That’s just a process that is working itself out.”
Find out
more from FloodSmart.gov
the official site of the National Flood Insurance Program.
No comments:
Post a Comment